Gå vidare till
Öppna vägledning

如何减少OB/GYN渎职索赔

A landmark study shows how patient simulation can be an OB/GYN’s best defense

最近studypublished inObstetrics & Gynecologyrevealed some compelling results for Obstetricians/Gynecologists (OB/GYNs) – but also those working in risk management. The study, “Association of Simulation Training with Rates of Medical Malpractice Claims Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists,” is potentially a game changer. It determined that simulationtraining significantly lowered malpractice claim rates for OB/GYNs1

In this article, we provide you with some key takeaways from the study, as well as some of our own content and research related to the topic of maternal outcomes.

Key takeaway #1: The data on maternal outcomes shows that improvement is needed now.

While reduced malpractice claims were used as a measure, the study is ultimately about improving patient outcomes.

The study underscores that in the U.S.,obstetric adverse events are estimated to occur in between 2% and 16% of all deliveries. One analysis found that 40.5% of adverse events could have been prevented.2

背景

Maternal mortality in the U.S. has continued to rise over the last few decades.3New data found that the maternal mortality rate in 2020 was 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births, compared with 20.1 in 2019.4This represents a14% increase in maternal deaths。Statistically significant increases in rates from 2019 to 2020 were seen in women of color, women aged 25-39, and women 40 and over.

这些令人震惊的数据不仅引起了患者安全的关注,而且还引起了法律责任。ob/gyns是任何医学界的医疗事故保险费率最高的之一,5and79% of OB/GYNs have been involved in a malpractice suit6

Whatever your connection to labor and delivery, the data confirms that taking steps to make an impact on these numbers deserves priority.

Key takeaway #2: This study was extensive, and spanned over several years.

The retrospective study was led by doctors and staff affiliated with four institutions: the Center for Medical Simulation, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and the CRICO/Risk Management Foundation of the Harvard Medical Institutions.7他们看着292年妇产科医生的性能,of whom were covered by the same insurer and all of whom undertook one or more simulation training sessions from 2002 to 2019. The trainings involved low-frequency, high-acuity obstetric scenarios, and focused on teamwork, communication, and organizational culture. Each training was followed immediately by debriefing.

What the study revealed is that simulation training resulted in a nearly 50% decrease in malpractice claim rates.

ob-claims-fact-1.png

drop in malpractice claims during the study period.8

What the study also revealed is thatattending more than one simulation session was associated with a greater reduction in claim rates。参加三个或更多培训的医生比参加一次培训的医生的仿真索赔率显着降低。

背景

过去在这一领域进行了研究,但没有得到高度宣传。

In 2012, the Premier Hospital network published a similar study based on 14 hospitals that participated in the Premier Perinatal Safety Initiative designed to train OB/GYNs and assist staff in response procedures to perinatal emergencies. The 14 hospitals used simulation as a training method. The resultswere that OB claims per delivery at the 13 hospitals decreased by 37%9, 10

Key takeaway #3: Malpractice claim rates are an objective measure of success.

衡量模拟程序的有效性可能是一个挑战。在许多研究中,李克特量表用于衡量参与者认为培训是否有价值或认为他们的技能有所提高,而不是查看对临床结果的影响。11利克特量表会向参与者提供一份声明,并要求他们评分他们同意的程度,使用从“完全同意”到“中性”到“强烈不同意”的价值观。12

sim-pays-for-itself.png

In this study, malpractice claims substantively take the place of a Likert scale or other measures. The study points out that claim rates are an objective, tangible, indicator of success.主要保险公司Crico监督了索赔数据的收集,以确保公正性和可靠性。

当涉及到对医院底线的影响模拟可以进行的影响时,这项研究表明了模拟如何获得回报。

Key takeaway #4: Teamwork and communication count.

The authors of the study affirmed what experts have known for some time:the skills gained during the simulation trainings – namely, effective teamwork during high-acuity situations – helped promote safer care, leading to fewer adverse outcomes that could potentially become malpractice claims later.13

背景

Concerns about communication and teamwork and how they can impact patient outcomes date back as far as the Institute of Medicine’s famous report,人非圣贤孰能, published in 1999. When looking at the root causes of adverse patient events, communication and teamwork breakdowns are the common thread.

联合委员会发现,有72%的不良产科事件是由沟通问题引起的。14

Naturally, the communication issues tied to adverse events have an impact on liability as well. One study found that 16-36% of malpractice suits against OB-GYNS involved miscommunication.15、16

最近的研究发现,涉及沟通崩溃的渎职索赔明显降低,被拒绝或驳回的可能性较小 - 他们的平均总成本更高。17

There was a time when communication and teamwork skills were considered separate from clinical skills. Today, they are considered an integral part of the delivery of clinical skills and patient safety.

帮助挽救产妇的生命

Over 50% of the typical hospital’s risk management budget is spent in labor and delivery18渎职保险的惊人成本导致医院寻求替代方案。美国医疗保健风险管理协会进行的一项研究发现80%的医院风险经理正在自我照顾他们的医生19这一切都指向与劳动和分娩相关的风险以及对患者的潜在后果 - 专家同意的后果在许多情况下是可以预防的。

随着孕产妇死亡率继续攀升,Laerdal致力于扭转这一趋势。

Laerdal’s mission is helping save lives. We pursue that mission by helping organizations like yours use simulation to educate and train your staff to provide optimal care. Our goal is to help save an additional 1 million lives annually by the year 2030. We seek out specific areas in healthcare where the need is crucial, with labor and delivery currently being one of the foremost.

Below, you’ll find an abundance of resources to help you get started with using simulation to improve maternal patient safety while reducing liability. And if you’d like to speak with a Laerdal representative, please fill out the form below.

Be om mer information

hurföredrardu at bli kontaktad?

Vi hanterar dina personliga kontaktuppgifter med stor omsorg, i enlighet medLaerdals integritetspolicy

Vi hanterar dina personliga kontaktuppgifter med stor omsorg, i enlighet medLaerdals integritetspolicy

References

  1. Schaffer,A。C.,Babayan,A.,Einbinder,J.S.,Sato,L。,&Gardner,R。(2021)。仿真培训与妇产科医生中医疗事故索赔的率有关。妇产科,138(2),246–252。https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004464
  2. 同上
  3. CDC。(2020)。怀孕死亡率监视系统。取自https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternal-mortality/pregnancy-mortality-mortality-surveillance-system.htm
  4. Hoyert,D。(2022)。美国孕产妇死亡率,2020年。CDC国家卫生统计中心。取自https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2020/maternal-mortality-rates-2020.htm
  5. Adinma, J. (2016). Litigations and the obstetrician in clinical practice. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 6(2); 74-79. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.181847
  6. Gallegos,A。(2021)。Medscape Dilcape Dractice Report 2021. Medscape。取自https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2021-malpractice-report-6014604#5
  7. Schaffer,A。C.,Babayan,A.,Einbinder,J.S.,Sato,L。,&Gardner,R。(2021)。请参阅参考#1。
  8. 同上
  9. Riley, W., Begun, J. W., Meredith, L., Miller, K. K., Connolly, K., Price, R., & Davis, S. (2016). Integrated approach to reduce perinatal adverse events: Standardized processes, interdisciplinary teamwork training, and performance feedback. Health Services Research, 51, 2431-2452. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12592
  10. Riley, W., Meredith, L. W., Price, R., Miller, K. K., Begun, J. W., McCullough, M., & Davis, S. (2016). Decreasing malpractice claims by reducing preventable perinatal harm. Health Services Research, 51, 2453-2471. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12551
  11. Schaffer,A。C.,Babayan,A.,Einbinder,J.S.,Sato,L。,&Gardner,R。(2021)。请参阅参考#1。
  12. Jamieson, S. (2017). Likert Scale. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Likert-Scale
  13. Schaffer,A。C.,Babayan,A.,Einbinder,J.S.,Sato,L。,&Gardner,R。(2021)。请参阅参考#1。
  14. The Joint Commission. (2004). Sentinel Event Alert 30: Preventing infant death and injury during delivery. Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/patient-safety-topics/sentinel-event/sentinel-event-alert-newsletters/sentinel-event-alert-issue-30-preventing-infant-death-and-injury-during-delivery/#.YjDbZHrMKUl
  15. 怀特(A.Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:1031–8。doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000158864.09443.77)
  16. CRICO. (2010). Malpractice risks in obstetrics: 2010 CRICO Strategies national CBS report
  17. Humphrey, K., Sundberg, M., Milliren, C., Graham, D., & Landrigan, C. Frequency and Nature of Communication and Handoff Failures in Medical Malpractice Claims. Journal of Patient Safety, 18(2), p. 130-137. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000937
  18. Premier Perinatal Safety Initiative. (2012). Reducing preventable birth injuries and liability claims through evidence-based care, enhanced teamwork. Retrieved from https://gshrm.org/images/meeting/091313/premier_white_paper_nov2012_final.pdf
  19. Brimmer, K. (2012). Risks involved with self-insuring physicians. Healthcare Finance. Retrieved from https://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/risks-involved-self-insuring-physicians-0
Baidu